Scripting Support, Programmable triggers anyone? |
Scripting Support, Programmable triggers anyone? |
May 2 2003, 01:01 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 168 Joined: 2-May 03 From: New Hampshire Member No.: 1 |
A common user feature request has been to adding the ability to program a trigger. You know, with if-then statements and for loops, etc.
If you had to choose a language, what would it be? Why? |
|
|
Aug 9 2003, 01:57 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 168 Joined: 2-May 03 From: New Hampshire Member No.: 1 |
I was reading macslash.com today and there is a discussion about Ruby 1.8, a scripting language. Reading thru the threads, here's a couple of choice comments people made:
QUOTE Ruby is cool (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 05, @01:31PM ( #45698 ) Ruby is pretty cool. It has a nice smalltalky approach which makes it quite agreeable if you love OOD - far nicer than Perl or Python. I still prefer Perl for scripting since CPAN has a lot more to offer than Ruby, and I generally am writing sysadmin scripts where OOD is not really needed or appropriate. Plus Perl is still a lot faster than Ruby or Python. But I am looking forward to seeing a wider availability of libs for Ruby's since when OOD/OOP is appropriate Ruby is a lot nicer to work with that the inconsistent mess that is Python, and Perl is even worse (though Perl 6 looks really promising). And someone else wrote: QUOTE Ruby is cool but I prefer F-Script (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 06, @09:11AM ( #45776 ) Ruby is quite nice and it is cool to see it included in OS X. However, I much prefer Smalltalk (in some way, it is sad to see that Ruby is not as good as a language designed 30 years ago), and as far as OS X scripting is concerned, I recommend looking at F-Script [fscript.org], which is natively based on the Cocoa/Objective-C object model. Any of you guys familar with Ruby and/or F-Script? /Jay |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th November 2024 - 06:27 AM |